Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Date
Msg-id 53568A2E.8080109@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  (Palle Girgensohn <girgen@FreeBSD.org>)
Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  (Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 04/22/2014 01:36 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 04/21/2014 06:19 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>>
>> If we never start we'll never get there.
>>
>> I can think of several organizations that might be approached to donate
>> hardware.
>
> Like .Org?
>
> We have a hardware farm, a rack full of hardware and spindles. It 
> isn't the most current but it is there.
>
>


I'm going away tomorrow for a few days R&R. when I'm back next week I 
will set up a demo client running this module. If you can have a machine 
prepped for this purpose by then so much the better, otherwise I will 
have to drag out a box I recently rescued and have been waiting for 
something to use it with. It's more important that it's stable (i.e. 
nothing else running on it) than that it's very powerful. It could be 
running Ubuntu or some Redhattish variant or, yes, even FreeBSD.

cheers

andrew





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Composite Datums containing toasted fields are a bad idea(?)
Next
From: Palle Girgensohn
Date:
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD