Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Date
Msg-id 5355C09B.6020903@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>)
Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 04/21/2014 08:49 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tatsuo Ishii (ishii@postgresql.org) wrote:
>> I observe performance degradation with PostgreSQL 9.3 vs 9.2 on Linux
>> as well.  The hardware is HP DL980G7, 80 cores, 2TB mem, RHEL 6,
>> pgbench is used (read only query), scale factor is 1,000 (DB size
>> 15GB).
> Can you isolate the sysv-vs-mmap patch and see what happens with just
> that change..?


This is exactly why we need a benchfarm.

I actually have a client working based on Greg Smith's pgbench tools.

What we would need is a way to graph the results - that's something 
beyond my very rudimentary expertise in web programming. If anyone feels 
like collaborating I'd be glad to hear from them (The web site is 
programmed in perl + TemplateToolkit, but even that's not immutable. I'm 
open to using, say, node.js plus one of its templating engines.


cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: assertion failure 9.3.4
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD