Re: Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet?
Date
Msg-id 5354.1189955695@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet?  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet?
List pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> Those bug reports have been bothering me for most of a year ...

> Are there any other outstanding reports like that?

Couldn't say.  Those two were on my mind because the reporters had
allowed me to troll through their table and index files and verify
that there were indeed multiple index pointers to the same table row,
and yet the index itself did not show any indication of corruption.
I had noticed the "clumping" pattern of the doubly-linked rows in
both cases, but hadn't found an explanation.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet?
Next
From: "Pavan Deolasee"
Date:
Subject: Re: Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet?