Re: Linking backend in one piece - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Linking backend in one piece
Date
Msg-id 5353.1203701300@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Linking backend in one piece  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
>> Yeah, I think it would be folly to assume that we can name all the
>> individual object files in one big command line.  But isn't the current
>> patch trying to do exactly that?

> The current patch assumes that it works in most environments and offers the 
> old way as a fallback.

I see, that's why you wanted the conditional in there.  It would need to
be documented in the build instructions.

Some experimentation with "find" suggests that the actual command length
will be under 12K, which is probably going to work on most modern
platforms, so maybe I'm worried over nothing.  Let's put it in and see
what the buildfarm says ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Full-text search default vs specified configuration
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default