Re: Buildfarm "master-next" branch? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: Buildfarm "master-next" branch?
Date
Msg-id 53507B19.3090707@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Buildfarm "master-next" branch?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 04/17/2014 10:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> IMO the best single thing that could happen for the buildfarm is if
> we had more critters (at least twice as many) running a wider variety of
> platforms, compilers, and configuration options than there are today.
> More frequent runs would come out of that automatically.

I'll be bringing up a new Windows buildfarm member once I've got a
current project knocked off. It's a pretty fast dedicated Windows Server
2012 box with a wide range of SDKs on it that can do 32-bit and 64-bit
builds.

Should help a little.

-- Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: assertion failure 9.3.4
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: How can we make beta testing better?