Re: Another thought about search_path semantics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Another thought about search_path semantics
Date
Msg-id 533EF3D0.6040508@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Another thought about search_path semantics  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Another thought about search_path semantics
List pgsql-hackers
On 04/04/2014 01:47 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> I wonder if we could extend the search path syntax to specify whether a
> schema should be used for creation of objects or not. Sounds somewhat
> nasty, but I don't really have a better idea :(. Something like
> search_patch=public,!pg_catalog.

No, if we're fixing this, then we should have a separate
"creation_target_schema" GUC.   The fact that the only way to designate
creation target schema was to put it at the start of the search path has
*always* been a problem, since 7.3.

Non-atomic data sucks.  ;-b

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Another thought about search_path semantics
Next
From: Костя Кузнецов
Date:
Subject: gsoc knn spgist