-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
El 02/04/14 10:24, Christian Kruse escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On 02.04.2014 14:53, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
>>>> Did you find time to look at it?
>>>
>>> No. I've been waiting for a comment on that :)
>>
>> Let me provide you an SRPM first, so that you can test. How does
>> it sound?
>
> What do you expect me to test? I thought you're going to generate
> alternative packages for different PostgreSQL versions?
>
> Tests would've been necessary if you compile repmgr against e.g.
> 9.3 and run it for 9.0 or something like that since macros and data
> types in PostgreSQL we use in repmgr changed.
The problem I see is that different versions of repmgr are made for
different versions of Postgres, or are they the same binaries just
placing the repmgr and repmgrd bins in different paths?
It ends up being annoying when you have more then one version of PG
installed (or at least more then one version of pgdg repository
configured), else, it's straight forward.
- --
Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTPCS8AAoJEHsDtEgBAFTSypsH/j0wlWPM49mCex964HNq5PYd
jGaIvJ9Tv9dpaoxWZ3bqpHhGEGASP/xqbSuDBJ+sElrcYbUkCOXG+NcoVz9iclnr
eFBa1aNaHOwThVEKEecPACRGeyIpX6157nHrE3650mXue1mIUDpLJYMqWWpJyE47
w7WoaVDjUxygJ/efPOYVjkRNyZAiPYlykwfrJuZcDHmoj+X0eQClljg0A5wYV87/
5vEVLT9NvU+DdBr/wLZDOOqvvVQPzzLp4PYr/OVZDcEb9/XZnQKWltwFsjVgKxJe
wf31k+t2K5hxU/DTj0Kk2SqGMtm9R5jW9yum2xXSlHVDuTcPs2kalrarzuqzT+E=
=uMnC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
