On 03/27/2014 04:43 PM, David Johnston wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote
>> When we made OIDs optional, we added an oid status display to \d+:
>>
>> test=> \d+ test
>> Table "public.test"
>> Column | Type | Modifiers | Storage | Stats target | Description
>> --------+---------+-----------+---------+--------------+-------------
>> x | integer | | plain | |
>> --> Has OIDs: no
>>
>> Do we want to continue displaying that OID line, or make it optional for
>> cases where the value doesn't match default_with_oids?
> If we didn't make it behave this way at the time of the change then what has
> changed that we should make it behave this way now? I like the logic
> generally but not necessarily the change.
>
> The disadvantage of this change is users (both end and tools) of the data
> now also have to look at what the default is (or was at the time the text
> was generated) to know what a suppressed OIDs means. Given how much
> information the typical \d+ generates I would suspect that the added noise
> this introduces is quickly ignored by frequent users and not all the
> disruptive to those who use \d+ infrequently. Tools likely would prefer is
> to be always displayed.
>
>
Frankly, to me it's just useless noise.
cheers
andrew
