Re: Trimming transaction logs after extended WAL archive failures - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: Trimming transaction logs after extended WAL archive failures
Date
Msg-id 53320AEF.4050305@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Trimming transaction logs after extended WAL archive failures  (Steven Schlansker <steven@likeness.com>)
Responses Re: Trimming transaction logs after extended WAL archive failures  (Steven Schlansker <steven@likeness.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 03/25/2014 03:54 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>
> On Mar 25, 2014, at 3:52 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
>
>> On 03/25/2014 01:56 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I have a Postgres 9.3.3 database machine.  Due to some intelligent work on the part of someone who shall remain
nameless,the WAL archive command included a ‘> /dev/null 2>&1’ which masked archive failures until the disk entirely
filledwith 400GB of pg_xlog entries. 
>>>
>>> I have fixed the archive command and can see WAL segments being shipped off of the server, however the xlog remains
ata stable size and is not shrinking.  In fact, it’s still growing at a (much slower) rate. 
>>
>> So what is wal_keep_segments set at in postgresql.conf?
>>
>
> 5000.  There are currently about 18000 WAL segments in pg_xlog.

I guess what I should have also asked previously is what exactly are you
doing, are you streaming as well as archiving?


>
>>>
>>> I’ve seen references to people just deleting “old” segment files or using pg_resetxlog to fix this situation,
howeverI already know that the response from the mailing list will be “that’s insane, don’t do that”. 
>>>
>>> So what is the correct solution to pursue here?  The steady state of the machine should have enough space, I just
needto reclaim some of it...  Thanks for any guidance! 
>>>
>>> Steven
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adrian Klaver
>> adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
>
>
>


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG choosing nested loop for set membership?
Next
From: Steven Schlansker
Date:
Subject: Re: Trimming transaction logs after extended WAL archive failures