Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"
Date
Msg-id 531FAE4A.6050600@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
Responses Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 03/11/2014 06:57 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mind you, I wouldn't be unhappy to see it go away; it's a kluge and always
> has been.  I'm just expecting lots of push-back if we try.  And it's kind
> of hard to resist push-back when you don't have a substitute to offer.

Yeah, what we really need is encapsulated per-DB users and local
superusers.  I think every agrees that this is the goal, but nobody
wants to put in the work to implement a generalized solution.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"