Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches
Date
Msg-id 5317.1222395592@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> 4. User charlie revokes alice's membership in admin.
>> 
>> Now what?  Alice's FK constraint is violated, according to the rules
>> KaiGai proposes.  Shall REVOKE have to grovel through every table in the
>> database looking for possible violations ... and of course locking the
>> entire DB against writes while it does it?  That's not gonna fly.  I
>> also note that the failure would expose knowledge of the contents of BT
>> and AT to charlie, which might not be thought desirable either.

> I assume Alice now gets an error on the query that references the
> now-invisible foreign key --- that sounds reasonable to me.

You mean her data just disappears?  Doesn't sound very reasonable to me.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Robert Haas"
Date:
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches