On 03/01/2014 12:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> In the case of Unix systems, there is a *far* simpler and more portable
> solution technique, which is to tell the test postmaster to put its socket
> in some non-world-accessible directory created by the test scaffolding.
+1 - I'm all for KISS.
>
> Of course that doesn't work for Windows, which is why we looked at the
> random-password solution. But I wonder whether we shouldn't use the
> nonstandard-socket-location approach everywhere else, and only use random
> passwords on Windows. That would greatly reduce the number of cases to
> worry about for portability of the password-generation code; and perhaps
> we could also push the crypto issue into reliance on some Windows-supplied
> functionality (though I'm just speculating about that part).
See for example
<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa379942%28v=vs.85%29.aspx>
cheers
andrew
