Re: Problem with PostgreSQL 9.2.7 and make check on AIX 7.1 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Rainer Tammer
Subject Re: Problem with PostgreSQL 9.2.7 and make check on AIX 7.1
Date
Msg-id 530D9392.4090906@spg.schulergroup.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Problem with PostgreSQL 9.2.7 and make check on AIX 7.1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Hello,
Just to clarify my picture:

backend process:

tammer 12255262 13107322 0 07:52:10 - 0:00 postgres:
                          tammer regression [local] SELECT waiting

If I send a SIGINT (-2) to the backend process then this would
be equivalent to the SIGINT send by the SIGALRM handler?

Bye
  Rainer

On 25.02.2014 19:47, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rainer Tammer <pgsql@spg.schulergroup.com> writes:
>> The semop() should be interrupted by SIGINT, right?
> Yeah.  Note that we're expecting the SIGINT handler to do a longjmp,
> so that it doesn't matter whether or not the semop would choose to
> resume waiting after a signal.  But it has to execute the handler.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
>

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: chrisrow
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #8470: 9.3 locking/subtransaction performance regression
Next
From: Rainer Tammer
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with PostgreSQL 9.2.7 and make check on AIX 7.1