On 1/24/14, 3:52 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Bruce Momjian<bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> >
>> >Is everyone else OK with this approach? Updated patch attached.
>> >
> Hi,
>
> I started to look at this patch and i found that it fails an assertion
> as soon as you run a VACUUM FULL after a lazy VACUUM even if those are
> on unrelated relations. For example in an assert-enabled build with
> the regression database run:
>
> VACUUM customer;
> [... insert here whatever commands you like or nothing at all ...]
> VACUUM FULL tenk1;
Is anyone else confused/concerned that regression testing didn't pick this up? The vacuum.sql test does not test lazy
vacuumat all, and I can't seem to find any other tests that test lazy vacuum either...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
