On 7/20/13, 9:06 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
> In theory this tool is promising though since it works by looking at
> the llvm bytecode to determine what the real syntax is. It should be
> able to handle the typedef issues we have with most of the the tools.
Since clang-format has no options to specify include file paths, I doubt
that it actually analyzes the file to the extent that it knows about
typedefs.
