Tom Lane wrote:
> The proposed patch to Makefile.shlib makes me gag :-( ...
It is ugly.
> lying to make
> about what's the purpose of a rule is seldom a good idea. Please try
> as attached instead.
I will ASAP.
> Also, I am *really* dubious about the change to
> ecpg/test/Makefile.regress --- if that's necessary then this whole
> exercise is wrong.
For a dynamic build you do not need the change.
Only a --disable-shared build will gag without it. I'll have a look
at that too.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
