On 01/29/2014 08:21 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> second question - is not this functionality too dangerous? If somebody
> use it as scheduler, then
>
> a) can holds connect, session data, locks too long time
> b) it can stop on query timeout probably much more early then user expect
>
> What is expected use case?
It is no more dangerous than plain pg_sleep(). The use case is
convenience and clarity of code.
I don't think people will be using it as a scheduler any more than they
do with pg_sleep() because it can't cross transaction boundaries.
--
Vik
