On 01/28/2014 10:29 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> In addition to this, the JSON vs JSONB datatype page really needs
>> expansion and clarification.
>
> right: exactly. I'd be happy to help (such as I can) ...I wanted to
> see if jsonb to make it in on this 'fest (doc issues notwithstanding);
> it hasn't been formally reviewed yet AFAICT. So my thinking here is
> to get docs to minimum acceptable standards in the short term and
> focus on the structural code issues for the 'fest (if jsonb slips then
> it's moot obviously).
Well, having reviewed the docs before Andrew sent them in, I felt they
already *were* "minimum acceptable". Certainly they're as complete as
the original JSON docs were.
Or is this just about whitespace and line breaks?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
