Re: new json funcs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: new json funcs
Date
Msg-id 52E2DA92.1020609@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to new json funcs  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: new json funcs
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/24/2014 12:59 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> On 01/24/2014 03:40 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
>> For consistency with the existing json functions (json_each,
>> json_each_text, etc.) it might be better to add separate
>> json_to_record_text and json_to_recordset_text functions in place of
>> the nested_as_text parameter to json_to_record and json_to_recordset.
>>
>>
> 
> It wouldn't be consistent with json_populate_record() and
> json_populate_recordset(), the two closest relatives, however.
> 
> And yes, I appreciate that we have not been 100% consistent. Community
> design can be a bit messy that way.

FWIW, I prefer the parameter to having differently named functions.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: new json funcs
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master