Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?
Date
Msg-id 52E19DDC.4090304@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why do we let autovacuum give up?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/23/2014 02:17 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> FWIW, I have a patch around somewhere that I never cleaned up properly for
> submissions that simply added a counter to pg_stat_user_tables indicating
> how many times vacuum had aborted on that specific table. If that's enough
> info  (it was for my case) to cover this case, I can try to dig it out
> again and clean it up...

It would be 100% more information than we currently have.  How much more
difficult would it be to count completed autovacuums as well?  It's
really the ratio of the two which matters ...

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [bug fix] pg_ctl always uses the same event source
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?