Re: Closing commitfest 2013-11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Fearing
Subject Re: Closing commitfest 2013-11
Date
Msg-id 52DECCB5.9000501@dalibo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Closing commitfest 2013-11  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Closing commitfest 2013-11  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/20/2014 10:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think the idea was that patch authors should take responsibility for
> pushing their patches forward to 2014-01 if they still wanted them
> considered.  Quite a few patches already were moved that way, IIRC.
>
> Agreed though that we shouldn't let them just rot.

Does this mean I can resurrect my pg_sleep_until() patch?  I didn't set
it back to Needs Review after I completely changed my approach based on
feedback.  I would hate for it to get lost just because I didn't know
how to use the commitfest app.

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1189

-- 
Vik




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Funny representation in pg_stat_statements.query.
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET typos and fix for temporary file name management