Re: Why conf.d should be default, and auto.conf and recovery.conf should be in it - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: Why conf.d should be default, and auto.conf and recovery.conf should be in it
Date
Msg-id 52D77427.6000001@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why conf.d should be default, and auto.conf and recovery.conf should be in it  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/16/2014 02:53 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Hackers,
> 
> ALTER SYSTEM SET has been committed and recovery.conf GUCs are being
> reviewed.  I'm going to make a last case for conf.d in relation to these
> two patches before 9.4 goes out the door.

Personally, I'd find conf.d greatly more useful when enabled by default.
The need to hack postgresql.conf to use it eliminates half the point of
having it.

I haven't seen any compelling reason why conf.d should NOT be enabled by
default.

-- Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Why conf.d should be default, and auto.conf and recovery.conf should be in it
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)