Re: proposal, patch: allow multiple plpgsql plugins - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marko Tiikkaja
Subject Re: proposal, patch: allow multiple plpgsql plugins
Date
Msg-id 52D2C3EC.6080609@joh.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to proposal, patch: allow multiple plpgsql plugins  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: proposal, patch: allow multiple plpgsql plugins  (Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/9/14, 11:41 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> There are two basic questions:
>
> b) will we support same API still - a reference on plugin_info in exec
> state is a issue - described in patch.

Pardon my ignorance, but why does the plugin_info have to be in the 
executor state?  If we're going to change the API, can't we pass it 
directly to the callback function?  Am I missing something completely 
obvious? :-)


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: ECPG regression tests generating warnings
Next
From: Marko Tiikkaja
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal, patch: allow multiple plpgsql plugins