Re: Standalone synchronous master - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Standalone synchronous master
Date
Msg-id 52D07B3A.5010504@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Standalone synchronous master  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/10/2014 02:47 PM, Andres Freund wrote:

> Really, the commits themselves are sent to the server at exactly the
> same speed independent of sync/async. The only thing that's delayed is
> the *notificiation* of the client that sent the commit. Not the commit
> itself.

Which is irrelevant to the point that if the standby goes down, we are 
now out of business.

Any continuous replication should not be a SPOF. The current behavior 
guarantees that a two node sync cluster is a SPOF. The proposed behavior 
removes that.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary 
act.", George Orwell



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master