Re: more psprintf() use - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: more psprintf() use
Date
Msg-id 52C9BFD5.6080903@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: more psprintf() use  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: more psprintf() use
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/2/14, 9:28 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki is right and you are wrong.  There is an ancient supposition that
> datatype output functions, in particular, always return palloc'd strings.
> 
> I recently got rid of the pfree's in the main output path, cf commit
> b006f4ddb988568081f8290fac77f9402b137120, which might explain why this
> patch passes regression tests; but there are still places in the code (and
> even more likely in third-party code) that will try to pfree the results.

Well, that seems kind of dangerous.  The next guys is going to write an
extension that is returning string constants directly, and there is no
straightforward way to detect this problem.  Perhaps we should have some
mode similar to the CLOBBER and COPY_*_TREES symbols to force a pfree()
in assertion-enabled builds?





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SQL assertions prototype
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: more psprintf() use