Re: A GIN index internals question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Karlsson
Subject Re: A GIN index internals question
Date
Msg-id 52BDA13E.3030505@proxel.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to A GIN index internals question  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/27/2013 08:22 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can a posting item / ItemPointer belonging to posting list/tree of
> some entry "stored" in a GIN index be "lossy"? If yes, under what
> circumstances would such a lossy ItemPointer be included for the
> entry?
>
> I got an impression that there may be some lossy ItemPointers stored
> in a GIN index while reading keyGetItem() code in
> src/backend/access/gin/ginget.c

No, they cannot be lossy. The reason keyGetItem() need to handle lossy 
pointers is because partial matching collects all TIDs from the posting 
trees matched by a key into a tidbitmap. This tidbitmap becomes lossy if 
the matching TIDs do not fit into the workmem.

-- 
Andreas Karlsson



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze
Next
From: Christian Convey
Date:
Subject: Question about Lockhart's book