Hi Hanada-san,
(2013/12/16 14:15), Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> I'm sorry to post separately, but I have some comments on document.
>
> (1) ctidscan
> Is session_preload_libraries available to enable the feature, like
> shared_*** and local_***? According to my trial it works fine like
> two similar GUCs.
>
It shall be available; nothing different from the two parameters that
we have supported for long time. Sorry, I missed the new feature to
mention about.
> (2) postgres_fdw
> JOIN push--down is a killer application of Custom Scan Provider
> feature, so I think it's good to mention it in the "Remote Query
> Optimization" section.
>
I added an explanation about remote join execution on the section.
Probably, it help users understand why Custom Scan node is here
instead of Join node. Thanks for your suggestion.
Best regards,
--
OSS Promotion Center / The PG-Strom Project
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
