Re: autovacuum_work_mem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: autovacuum_work_mem
Date
Msg-id 52A8D4E3.9010603@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to autovacuum_work_mem  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/11/2013 12:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> And, for that matter, accepting this patch by no means blocks doing
>> something more sophisticated in the future.
> 
> Yeah.  I think the only real argument against it is "do we really need
> yet another knob?".  Since Josh, who's usually the voicer of that
> argument, is for this one, I don't have a problem with it.

This passes the "is it a chronic problem not to have a knob for this?" test.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum_work_mem
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Reference to parent query from ANY sublink