Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Date
Msg-id 52A667F9.9070604@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good  (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/10/2013 05:20 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
>>
> 
> FWIW, if synchronize_seqscans is on I'd think it'd be pretty easy to
> fire up a 2nd backend to do the ANALYZE portion (or perhaps use Robert's
> fancy new shared memory stuff).

Apologies for posting the same as a new idea before I saw your post. I
need to finish the thread before posting.

-- Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: dblink performance regression