Re: RFC: programmable file format for postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: RFC: programmable file format for postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id 529F862B.2040706@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RFC: programmable file format for postgresql.conf  (Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht@nosys.es>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/4/13, 2:02 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
>     So optional fields are either purely optional (i.e., only for tools
> that want to use them; everyone else may ignore, but preserve, them) and
> some other are just NULLABLEs, depending on the parameter).

But my point stands: If it's optional, you can't rely on it, if it's
required, people will object because they don't more junk in their
config file.

But I think this is solving the wrong problem.  The metadata is already
available via postgres --describe-config.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: variant of regclass