Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine
Date
Msg-id 5294BED4.7080409@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine  (Craig James <cjames@emolecules.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On 11/26/2013 09:26 AM, Craig James wrote:
>
>         On 25.11.2013 22:01, Lee Nguyen wrote:
>
>
>             Why shouldn't we run Postgres in a VM?  What are the
>             downsides? Does anyone
>             have any metrics or benchmarks with the latest Postgres?
>
>
> For those of us with small (a few to a dozen servers), we'd like to
> get out of server maintenance completely. Can anyone with experience
> on a cloud VM solution comment?  Do the VM solutions provided by the
> major hosting companies have the same good performance as the VM's
> that that several have described here?
>
> Obviously there's Amazon's new Postgres solution available.  What else
> is out there in the way of "instant on" solutions with
> Linux/Postgres/Apache preconfigured systems?  Has anyone used them in
> production?
>
>

If you want a full stack including Postgres, Heroku might be your best
bet. Depends a bit on your application and your workload. And yes, I've
used it. Full disclosure: I have done work paid for by Heroku.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Craig James
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine