Re: Make uselocale protection more consistent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Make uselocale protection more consistent
Date
Msg-id 5291edbd-1d80-4876-ca01-725156a08f55@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Make uselocale protection more consistent  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 03.07.23 08:24, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I propose[1] that we get rid of HAVE_LOCALE_T completely and make
> "libc" provider support unconditional.  It's standardised, and every
> target system has it, even Windows.  But Windows doesn't have
> uselocale().
> 
> [1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKGL7CmmzeRhoirzjECmOdABVFTn8fo6gEOaFRF1Oxey6Hw%40mail.gmail.com#aef2f2274b28ff8a36f9b8a598e3cec0

Ok, it appears your patch is imminent, so let's wait for that and see if 
this patch here is still required afterwards.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup check vs Windows file path limits
Next
From: "Euler Taveira"
Date:
Subject: Re: logicalrep_message_type throws an error