Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zubkovsky, Sergey
Subject Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT
Date
Msg-id 528853D3C5ED2C4AA8990B504BA7FB850106DF14@sol.transas.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT
List pgsql-hackers
The previous results were received on PG 8.3 version:
"PostgreSQL 8.3.0, compiled by Visual C++ build 1400"


-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 7:19 PM
To: Zubkovsky, Sergey
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT

[ moved to -hackers --- see original thread here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2008-03/msg00039.php
]

"Zubkovsky, Sergey" <Sergey.Zubkovsky@transas.com> writes:
> Here is my example.

Hmm ... on my Fedora machine I get the same result (704512) in
all these cases, which is what I'd expect.  (The exact value
could vary across platforms, of course.)

You said you were using the MinGW build --- maybe MinGW's version
of stat(2) isn't trustworthy?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly