On Dec 28, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net> wrote:
>> I know its been discussed before, and one big problem is license and patent
>> problems.
>>
>> Would this project be a problem:
>>
>> http://oldhome.schmorp.de/marc/liblzf.html
>
> It looks like even liblzf is not going to be accepted. I have proposed
> to only link against liblzf if available for pg_dump and have somehow
> failed, see:
I thought that was mostly about not wanting multiple changes in one patch. I don't see why liblzf would be
objectionablein general.
...Robert
