Re: Clang 3.3 Analyzer Results - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Clang 3.3 Analyzer Results
Date
Msg-id 5282A62A.5070400@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Clang 3.3 Analyzer Results  (Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 11/11/13, 1:33 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> The analyzer is reporting some findings, and some of the findings look
> legitimate.

We have been tracking clang scan-build results for some time, and fixed
quite a few of them.  Most of the remaining ones are false positives.
Maybe there are still a few that could be fixed, but certainly
scan-build is not suitable as an acceptance test of the PostgreSQL
source at this point.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: simple query with radically different plan after 9.0 -> 9.2 upgrade
Next
From: Kevin Goess
Date:
Subject: Re: simple query with radically different plan after 9.0 -> 9.2 upgrade