On 17/12/2018 23:05, Tom Lane wrote:
> [ pokes at that for a bit ] The logic here is a bit denser than
> one could wish, but here's a draft patch that seems to get the
> job done. It passes check-world, which isn't conclusive but
> at least suggests that this doesn't break anything.
This looks good to me. I can't think of any other syntax scenarios that
it needs to address.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
