On 9/23/13 12:54 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> I still find it wierd/inconsistent to have:
> * pg_receivexlog
> * pg_recvlogical
> binaries, even from the same source directory. Why once "pg_recv" and
> once "pg_receive"?
It's consistent because they are the same length!
(Obviously, this would severely restrict future tool naming.)
In all seriousness, I like this naming best so far.
