Re: Changed behavior in rewriteheap - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Changed behavior in rewriteheap
Date
Msg-id 5234480a-f831-4bba-bb92-b9d34452b96a@iki.fi
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Changed behavior in rewriteheap  (Erik Nordström <erik@timescale.com>)
Responses Re: Changed behavior in rewriteheap
List pgsql-hackers
On 22/11/2024 15:56, Erik Nordström wrote:
> Yes, it solves the issue so it looks good.
> 
> Just a minor nit: the code uses both blokno as local variable for 
> pending_writes[i].blkno and directly accessing pending_writes[i].blkno. 
> Maybe it is better to just use the local variable. For example, change
> 
> ++ b/src/backend/storage/smgr/bulk_write.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,8 @@ smgr_bulk_flush(BulkWriteState *bulkstate)
>                          }
> 
>                          smgrextend(bulkstate->smgr, bulkstate->forknum, 
> blkno, page, true);
> -                       bulkstate->relsize = pending_writes[i].blkno + 1;
> +                       bulkstate->relsize++;
> +                       Assert(bulkstate->relsize == blkno + 1);
> 
> Just a suggestion.

Made that change and committed to master and REL_17_STABLE. I didn't 
bother with the assertion though. Also I removed the 'pages_written' 
field, it was not used for anything anymore.

Thanks!

-- 
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: PoC: prefetching data between executor nodes (e.g. nestloop + indexscan)
Next
From: Erik Nordström
Date:
Subject: Re: Changed behavior in rewriteheap