Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> FYI, I spoke to Tom Lane about this at PGCon and suggested that he
> look at the proposed patch as I requested in
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmobPqrAVXOBMHTcpDq8hX7gCzcVhoUvC8s9V=d09+bt30w@mail.gmail.com
> and see whether that would address his concerns, and he said that he
> would do that. It may, however, have slipped his mind.
Not entirely, though I've been wrapped up in pg_dump fixes for the last
little while. I'll get to this soon.
regards, tom lane