Re: Does larger i/o size make sense? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Does larger i/o size make sense?
Date
Msg-id 521D040A.8060509@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Does larger i/o size make sense?  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
Responses Re: Does larger i/o size make sense?  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kevin,

> I think I've seen a handful of reports of performance differences
> with different BLCKSZ builds (perhaps not all on community lists). 
> My recollection is that some people sifting through data in data
> warehouse environments see a performance benefit up to 32KB, but
> that tests of GiST index performance with different sizes showed
> better performance with smaller sizes down to around 2KB.

I believe that Greenplum currently uses 128K.  There's a definite
benefit for the DW use-case.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: Does larger i/o size make sense?
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore multiple --function options