Re: SQL statement over 500% slower with 9.2 compared with 9.1 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Rafael Martinez
Subject Re: SQL statement over 500% slower with 9.2 compared with 9.1
Date
Msg-id 521C6F1F.5070901@usit.uio.no
Whole thread Raw
In response to SQL statement over 500% slower with 9.2 compared with 9.1  (Rafael Martinez <r.m.guerrero@usit.uio.no>)
Responses Re: SQL statement over 500% slower with 9.2 compared with 9.1
List pgsql-performance
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/26/2013 02:33 PM, Rafael Martinez wrote:
[............]
> The SQL statement is:
>
> SELECT  firstname || ' ' || lastname AS Name FROM    Person R WHERE
> R.gender like 'F' AND  19 < (SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT filmId) FROM
> FilmParticipation F WHERE  F.partType = 'director' AND F.personId =
> R.personId    ) AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT  * FROM
> FilmParticipation D WHERE   D.partType = 'director' AND D.personId
> = R.personId AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT  * FROM    FilmParticipation
> C WHERE   C.partType = 'cast' AND C.filmId = D.filmId AND
> C.personId = D.personId ) ) ;
>
>
[.............]
>
> We can see that the query plan is very different between versions
> and that 9.2 is really wrong with the number of rows involved. Why
> is 9.2 taking so wrong about the number of rows involved in some
> parts of the plan?
>

Hei

More information:

If we turn off enable_indexscan the runtime gets more similar to the
one we get with 9.1, we are down to 4200ms.

The query plan with this configuration is here:
http://explain.depesz.com/s/jVR

The question remains the same, why is 9.2 using such a different and
bad plan compared to 9.1, when the data and the configuration are the
same?

regards,
- --
 Rafael Martinez Guerrero
 Center for Information Technology
 University of Oslo, Norway

 PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlIcbx8ACgkQBhuKQurGihReJgCcCiEfGQ0rZHcazlN3Ihb2PeCn
jOsAnjkh1M0j4r1DQJ4Xb1djZ+y4mji3
=Td8b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Дмитрий Дегтярёв
Date:
Subject: Cpu usage 100% on slave. s_lock problem.
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Cpu usage 100% on slave. s_lock problem.