On 08/26/2013 01:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> All the other variables are either already exposed, don't seem to be all
> that interesting or not necessary accurate for a running cluster.
>
> I'd vote for doing things piecemal here, otherwise it seems to be too
> likely that we never get anywhere.
Ok, that sounds like a vote to accept the pg_system_identifier patch, then.
Given that the one thing I'd like to do is add to the docs on that
patch, cautioning users that system_identifier doesn't mean what they
think it means.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
