Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
Date
Msg-id 5213.1105592092@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> My basic idea was to keep a status bit on each index entry telling it if
> a previous backend looked at the heap and determined it was valid.

Even if you could track the tuple's committed-good status reliably, that
isn't enough under MVCC.  The tuple might be committed good, and seen
that way by some other backend that set the bit, and yet it's not supposed
to be visible to your older transaction.  Or the reverse at tuple
deletion.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)