Re: Fwd: Proposal: variant of regclass - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Fwd: Proposal: variant of regclass
Date
Msg-id 5212.1396968635@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fwd: Proposal: variant of regclass  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Fwd: Proposal: variant of regclass  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Looks good, committed with a bit of further cleanup.

I had not actually paid attention to the non-regclass parts of this, and
now that I look, I've got to say that it seems borderline insane to have
chosen to implement regproc/regoper rather than regprocedure/regoperator.
The types implemented here are incapable of dealing with overloaded names,
which --- particularly in the operator case --- makes them close to
useless.  I don't think this code was ready to commit.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: COUNT(*) (and related) speedup