> Benjamin Arai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a really big Tsearch2 table (100s GB) that takes a while to
>> perform
>> queries and takes days to index. Is there any way to fix these issues
>> using UNIONs or partitioning? I was thinking that I could partition the
>> data by date but since I am always performing queries on the Tsearch2
>> field I do not know if this will help performance. I think paritioning
>> will help the indexing problem since I can incrementally re-index the
>> data
>> but again I figured it would be better to ask.
>>
>> Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
>>
>> System I am running on:
>>
>> -Raid 5 with 16x drives
>
> RAID 5 with 16 spindles? RAID 10 will give you better performance I
> would think.
>
>
>> -Quad core XEON
>> 16 GB of memory (Any suggestion on the postgresql.conf setup would also
>> be
>> great! Currently I am just setting shared mem to 8192MB)
>
> Assuming 8.1+ I would try something much more aggressive, like 4GB.
> Dont' forget your effective_cache_size.
How is 4GB more aggressive? How large should the effective_cache_size be?
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>> -x86_64 but Redhat 5 Ent
>>
>> Benjamin
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>>
>
>
> --
>
> === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
> Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
> Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
> http://www.commandprompt.com/
>
> Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
> PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
>
>
