On 2025/03/13 0:32, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> Fair enough. The code is more readable this way. That itself is an improvement.
>
> I stared at c4d5cb71d229095a39fda1121a75ee40e6069a2a to see whether
> there's any reason this was left aside at that time. I am convinced
> that it was just missed. I think this patch is good to be committed.
Thanks for reviewing the patch and confirming! I've pushed the patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
