Re: FK v.s unique indexes - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rafal Pietrak
Subject Re: FK v.s unique indexes
Date
Msg-id 51c04eeb-38d2-eb69-2508-d310504e44ce@ztk-rp.eu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FK v.s unique indexes  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-general

W dniu 03.07.2018 o 11:23, David Rowley pisze:
> On 3 July 2018 at 19:30, Rafal Pietrak <rafal@ztk-rp.eu> wrote:
[---------------]
>>
>> Why is this forbidden?
> 
> I don't think there were any actual roadblocks, it was more of just
> not enough time in the cycle to make it work due to a few technical
> details that required extra effort to make work.
> 
> Alvaro managed to simplify the problem and allow foreign keys to be
> defined on partitioned tables and get that into PG11.
> 
> So it was a case of 50% is better than 0%, which I very agree with.
> 

I see.

It's great and usefull, yes. And I'm looking forward to see the other 50% :)

Thenx!!

-R


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rafal Pietrak
Date:
Subject: Re: FK v.s unique indexes
Next
From: Rob Sargent
Date:
Subject: Re: FK v.s unique indexes