Re: Improvement of checkpoint IO scheduler for stable transaction responses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: Improvement of checkpoint IO scheduler for stable transaction responses
Date
Msg-id 51E677E7.6070803@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improvement of checkpoint IO scheduler for stable transaction responses  (Ants Aasma <ants@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Improvement of checkpoint IO scheduler for stable transaction responses
List pgsql-hackers
On 7/16/13 11:36 PM, Ants Aasma wrote:
> As you know running a full suite of write benchmarks takes a very long
> time, with results often being inconclusive (noise is greater than
> effect we are trying to measure).

I didn't say that.  What I said is that over a full suite of write 
benchmarks, the effect of changes like this has always averaged out to 
zero.  You should try it sometime.  Then we can have a useful discussion 
of non-trivial results instead of you continuing to tell me I don't 
understand things.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: XLogInsert scaling, revisited
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Improvement of checkpoint IO scheduler for stable transaction responses