Re: [PATCH] big test separation POC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: [PATCH] big test separation POC
Date
Msg-id 51DEF40B.1020305@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [PATCH] big test separation POC  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 07/11/2013 09:19 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Fabien COELHO escribió:
>
>> Note that this is really a POC. How to derive a file is under
>> discussion: it has been suggested that the unix shell approach would
>> not work on Windows. I've suggested perl or python (which version?)
>> but I'm not sure that it is okay either.
>
> The other option, suggested by Andres somewhere, is to have a new
> parameter to pg_regress, something like --run-serially.  So you would
> use the same parallel schedule file, but serially instead of following
> the parallel specification.

Ok, this sounds like it needs a *lot* of discussion before it's a patch.Marking "returned with feedback", and we'll
discussit until September 
(or beyond).

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Regex pattern with shorter back reference does NOT work as expected
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review])