On 07/05/2013 10:09 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Yeah, it would be good to revive this thread now, which is the
> beginning of the development cycle. As of now, just to recall
> everybody, an agreement on this patch still needs to be found... Simon
> is concerned with backward compatibility. Greg presented a nice spec
> some time ago (Robert and I liked it) which would break backward
> compatibility but allow to begin with a fresh infrastructure.
As folks know, I favor Smith's approach. However, as far as I can find,
GSmith never posted a patch for his version.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
